The old generalist vs. specialist debate feels obsolete in the AI era. The emphasis on integration as the winning edge captures the essence of where work is headed. This is a roadmap for how to stay relevant and indispensable in the years ahead.
Why are current language models constantly putting out "negative pre-frames" - saying what it isn't before saying what it is. I see it over and over again in Substack notes. It's as if machines are teaching us to speak backwards. This is not a good thing.
Because people generally engage more with content that warns them off a potential threat or something that they should be aware of I personally don’t like it either when I see it all the time, especially in the headlines that start with stop or most professionals are… I’m not completely free of it either, but I try to pay attention to this
The old generalist vs. specialist debate feels obsolete in the AI era. The emphasis on integration as the winning edge captures the essence of where work is headed. This is a roadmap for how to stay relevant and indispensable in the years ahead.
Why are current language models constantly putting out "negative pre-frames" - saying what it isn't before saying what it is. I see it over and over again in Substack notes. It's as if machines are teaching us to speak backwards. This is not a good thing.
Because people generally engage more with content that warns them off a potential threat or something that they should be aware of I personally don’t like it either when I see it all the time, especially in the headlines that start with stop or most professionals are… I’m not completely free of it either, but I try to pay attention to this
Great synopsis of the new skills that Founders will need too.
Thank you, where do you see yourself in this framework?