Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Colette Molteni's avatar

When I first read the title, my middle-manager brain should have gone straight to panic mode. Instead, as I read on, I found myself nodding along. It was reassuring to see that the shift you describe is precisely where I’ve already been heading.

My humble leadership style is empathic leadership: people first, always. My focus is on developing my team’s capabilities, making strategic decisions, and guiding us toward long-term outcomes, not on keeping track of who’s doing what minute-to-minute. Coordination is a much smaller part of my role, and if I see it starting to take over, I delegate it.

Just recently, I brought in a project manager so my team and I could get back to what we do best, driving strategic initiatives. Posts like this remind me: staying relevant as a leader means shifting from managing tasks to empowering people. AI might be taking coordination off our plates, but that makes room for the real work of leadership.

Expand full comment
Rajesh  Mathur's avatar

This is an interesting distinction. It seems you're conflating people managers with project managers, which are quite different roles.

​Based on what I've seen at many companies, including FAANG/MAANG, it's the people manager role that's becoming less desirable, meaningful, and valuable. The ratio of managers to individual contributors is increasing, which puts the people manager role at risk of becoming obsolete.

​In contrast, the project manager role is here to stay, particularly the part that involves orchestration. I've been involved in over 100 projects, including managing some 'real' AI projects, and while I do delegate some tasks to AI, I don't see it replacing me anytime soon. It might happen someday, but not in the foreseeable future.

Expand full comment

No posts